How people outside see you, and how you can measure it.
Institutional imageالصورة المؤسسية
The picture people hold of an institution: what they expect from it and how far they trust it. It is shaped less by what the institution says than by what people live with its staff, visit after visit. That is why it is built from inside, every day.
Brand Promise vs Patient Experience: How to Audit the GapRoadyom MirrorBrand promise
Brand promiseوعد العلامة
What an institution tells the public to expect from it, in its advertising, signs, website and words at the desk. A promise people can test, such as “results within 24 hours”, is one they will also judge you on.
Brand Promise vs Patient Experience: How to Audit the GapRoadyom MirrorService quality gap model
Patient experienceتجربة المريض
Everything patients and their families live through in their contact with a health service, from booking to billing. It covers how they were spoken to, informed, kept waiting and cared for, not only the clinical result. Surveys such as HCAHPS measure part of it.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2026
Hospital Online Reviews: What They Can and Cannot Tell YouRoadyom MirrorHCAHPS
Customer experience (CX)تجربة العميل
The sum of a customer’s contacts with an organisation and how they felt about them. In a bank, a school or a municipality, it is made at the counter, on the phone and in the queue. It is the same idea as patient experience, outside health.
Roadyom MirrorNet Promoter Score (NPS)Statistics: Experience and online reviews
Public experienceتجربة الجمهور
The experience of residents, students, families or citizens with a public institution. It includes people who never chose the service and cannot easily go elsewhere, which raises the stakes of every contact.
Roadyom MirrorInstitutional imageStatistics: Service waiting
Service quality gap modelنموذج فجوات جودة الخدمة
A model by Parasuraman, Zeithaml and Berry (1985) that explains poor service as a series of gaps between what customers expect and what they receive. Each gap points to a different place to fix: listening, standards, delivery or communication.
Source: Journal of Marketing, 1985
Brand Promise vs Patient Experience: How to Audit the GapRoadyom MirrorCommunication gap (Gap 4)
Communication gap (Gap 4)فجوة التواصل (الفجوة 4)
The fourth gap in the service quality model: the distance between what an institution promises in public and what it actually delivers. Overpromising raises expectations, and the same service then feels worse.
Source: Journal of Marketing, 1985
Brand Promise vs Patient Experience: How to Audit the GapRoadyom MirrorBrand promise
SERVQUALمقياس SERVQUAL
A survey scale built from the gap model that compares what customers expected with what they perceived. It has been adapted to hospitals, banks and schools, and its dimensions remain debated.
Source: Health Services Research, 1992
Service quality gap modelBrand Promise vs Patient Experience: How to Audit the Gap
HCAHPSاستبيان HCAHPS
Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems: the first national, standardised, publicly reported survey of patients’ views of hospital care in the United States. Results have been public since March 2008.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2026
Hospital Online Reviews: What They Can and Cannot Tell YouStatistics: Experience and online reviewsOnline reviews
Online reviewsالمراجعات الإلكترونية
Ratings and comments people post in public about a service, unprompted. They are not a representative sample, yet studies find they track formal patient surveys and raise topics surveys never ask about.
Source: BMJ Quality & Safety, 2012
Hospital Online Reviews: What They Can and Cannot Tell YouRoadyom MirrorStatistics: Experience and online reviews
Fake review ruleقاعدة المراجعات المزيّفة
A 2024 US Federal Trade Commission rule that bans fake reviews, buying reviews of a set sentiment, undisclosed insider reviews and review suppression. Answering reviews well is allowed; manufacturing them is not.
Source: Morgan Lewis, 2024
Hospital Online Reviews: What They Can and Cannot Tell YouOnline reviews
Net Promoter Score (NPS)صافي نقاط الترويج
A loyalty measure introduced by Fred Reichheld in 2003, based on one question: how likely are you to recommend us, from 0 to 10. The share of detractors (0–6) is subtracted from the share of promoters (9–10). It is simple to track, and says little about why.
Source: Harvard Business Review, 2003
Customer experience (CX)Statistics: Experience and online reviews
Perceived waiting timeوقت الانتظار المُدرَك
How long a wait feels to the person waiting, as opposed to the minutes on the clock. In emergency departments, perceived waits, information and courtesy predicted satisfaction better than actual waits did.
Source: Annals of Emergency Medicine, 1996
Statistics: Service waitingPublic experience